-
Re: What was the very first typeface described as “feminine”?
Your “almost entirely” is my “not at all near.” I have known too many people who didn’t fit that binary, even for physical genitalia. That is unfair nonsense. The list was nothing to do with “contri…11 -
Re: What was the very first typeface described as “feminine”?
What's funny is, if I was asked to categorize them, I would have put the assignment of the triangles the other way around. But then again, I wouldn't have thought either one was really clea…4 -
Re: SepidKhan: An alternate for Persian/Arabic braille
For almost all writing systems, the main reason they are still around is their history! This is not a meaningful criticism. Very few were designed in some logical manner according to a rational schem…1 -
Re: SepidKhan: An alternate for Persian/Arabic braille
Also, a small error: "Other advantages of using SepidKhan is the fact that it’s LTR" I believe you meant to say RTL, no?1 -
Re: Web Fonts Guide
Agreed that bad letterspacing is common, and sucks. But I am all for careful, subtle tracking of the typeface when it is used at a size significantly different than its design size.1
